Istnienie klas społecznych często pomijane jest w mediach główno-nurtowych, a jeżeli już pada termin „klasa” trudno nie odnieść wrażenia, że na świeci...
Po raz 44 spotykamy się na łamach anarchistycznego periodyku „Inny Świat”. Tym razem, nieco szerzej, podjęliśmy dwa, a nawet trzy tematy... Niejako te...
Tureckie władze w osobie prezydenta Erdoğana rozpoczęły zmasowaną kampanię prześladowania zamieszkałej w tym kraju mniejszości kurdyjskiej. Wszystko z...
Jak blisko jesteśmy nienawiści Niemców lat trzydziestych do „obcych”? W ostatnią sobotę zorganizowano manifestacje skierowane przeciwko uchodźcom z kr...
Bardzo duża część uchodźców, przedstawianych jako Syryjczycy, jest tak naprawdę Kurdami, zamieszkującymi Syrię. Kurdowie od lat toczą walkę o stworzen...
Top-secret consignments across Channel are halted as a result of IoS investigation
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
Top-secret shipments of weapons-ready plutonium through British waters have been stopped, after their exposure by The Independent on Sunday. The Department for Transport (DfT) said last week that it had taken "regulatory action" to prohibit the shipments from Sellafield to Normandy on an unarmed old roll-on, roll-off ferry, with few safety or security features. The prohibition, the first of its kind, was imposed after complaints by the French nuclear safety authorities.
The shipments – denounced by nuclear weapons experts as "madness" and "totally irresponsible" – were carrying hundreds of kilograms of plutonium-dioxide powder, described as the ideal material for terrorists seeking to create a nuclear explosion or make a dirty bomb. Only 10kg of the plutonium, experts claim, would be needed to make a terrorist atomic weapon.
John Large, an independent nuclear expert, called it "the most dangerous and worst possible material you could ship". The first shipment – in the converted ferry Atlantic Osprey – was about to leave Cumbria for a French nuclear complex at Cap la Hague in March, when the plan was exposed in The IoS.
Peter Ainsworth, the Conservative environment spokesman, and Steve Webb, his Lib-Dem counterpart, condemned the shipment as a threat to national security and it was delayed for two months, finally taking place secretly on 21 May.
But last Tuesday, in a parliamentary answer slipped out just before the Commons broke up for the summer, the junior Transport minister Jim Fitzpatrick told the Liberal Democrat MP, Norman Baker: "As a result of discussion between this department and L'Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire regarding the shipment of plutonium by Sellafield Ltd in May, and our subsequent investigations, we took regulatory action to prevent further shipments of plutonium from Sellafield in the same manner."
Late last week, the DfT refused to explain why it had acted, apart from saying that "the company failed to abide by the terms of its certificate of approval".
Sellafield Ltd has said it is appealing against the decision. It said: "We take this matter very seriously", adding: "We are unable to comment any further."
Mr Baker, the Lib-Dem transport spokesman, said: "The Government was very lax in allowing this material to be shipped on such an unsuitable vessel. Sadly, the evidence is it will do nothing to challenge the nuclear industry unless forced to do so by public pressure, in this case following the exposure of the shipments in The IoS."
The plans resulted from one of Britain's least known industrial scandals: the failure of a controversial £473m plant at Sellafield which was, designed to make new fuel out of plutonium and uranium recovered from reprocessing at the nuclear complex.
In March, Energy minister Malcolm Wicks had to admit that the plant, designed to produce 120 tons of the fuel a year, had worked so badly that it had managed only 5.3 in five years of operation. Which meant Sellafield had to turn to its chief rival, in France, to complete its orders.
Protest przeciwko zawłaszczaniu tegorocznego marszu antyfaszystowskiego 11 listopada przez partię Razem i współpracujące z nią organizacje, podpisaneg...
Manchester Solidarity Federation sprzeciwia się zarówno opcji "in" jak i "out". W sprawie referendum dotyczącego członkostwa w Unii Europejskiej wyraż...
Nie należy jednak zbyt na to liczyć. Można być niemal pewnym, iż żaden uczony nie ośmieli się dziś traktować człowieka tak, jak traktuje królika; trze...
Mówiłem już, gdzie szukać zasadniczej praktycznej przyczyny potężnego jeszcze obecnie oddziaływania wierzeń religijnych na masy ludowe. Owe właściwe i...
W dniach 25-26 czerwca, anarchosyndykaliści spotkali się na konferencji pod Madrytem, by omówić powstanie nowej federacji i utworzenie na nowo anarch...
„Omawiając działalność i rolę anarchistów w rewolucji, Kropotkin powiedział: ‘My, anarchiści rozmawialiśmy dużo o rewolucjach, ale niewielu z nas zost...
Jak się okazuje, kulturalne elity zaczęły dyskutować o warunkach pracy w restauracjach i barach, gdzie są stałymi bywalcami. Pomimo faktu, że wiele sz...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ferry-shipments-of-terror...
Ferry shipments of 'terror-threat' plutonium end
Top-secret consignments across Channel are halted as a result of IoS investigation
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
Top-secret shipments of weapons-ready plutonium through British waters have been stopped, after their exposure by The Independent on Sunday. The Department for Transport (DfT) said last week that it had taken "regulatory action" to prohibit the shipments from Sellafield to Normandy on an unarmed old roll-on, roll-off ferry, with few safety or security features. The prohibition, the first of its kind, was imposed after complaints by the French nuclear safety authorities.
The shipments – denounced by nuclear weapons experts as "madness" and "totally irresponsible" – were carrying hundreds of kilograms of plutonium-dioxide powder, described as the ideal material for terrorists seeking to create a nuclear explosion or make a dirty bomb. Only 10kg of the plutonium, experts claim, would be needed to make a terrorist atomic weapon.
John Large, an independent nuclear expert, called it "the most dangerous and worst possible material you could ship". The first shipment – in the converted ferry Atlantic Osprey – was about to leave Cumbria for a French nuclear complex at Cap la Hague in March, when the plan was exposed in The IoS.
Peter Ainsworth, the Conservative environment spokesman, and Steve Webb, his Lib-Dem counterpart, condemned the shipment as a threat to national security and it was delayed for two months, finally taking place secretly on 21 May.
But last Tuesday, in a parliamentary answer slipped out just before the Commons broke up for the summer, the junior Transport minister Jim Fitzpatrick told the Liberal Democrat MP, Norman Baker: "As a result of discussion between this department and L'Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire regarding the shipment of plutonium by Sellafield Ltd in May, and our subsequent investigations, we took regulatory action to prevent further shipments of plutonium from Sellafield in the same manner."
Late last week, the DfT refused to explain why it had acted, apart from saying that "the company failed to abide by the terms of its certificate of approval".
Sellafield Ltd has said it is appealing against the decision. It said: "We take this matter very seriously", adding: "We are unable to comment any further."
Mr Baker, the Lib-Dem transport spokesman, said: "The Government was very lax in allowing this material to be shipped on such an unsuitable vessel. Sadly, the evidence is it will do nothing to challenge the nuclear industry unless forced to do so by public pressure, in this case following the exposure of the shipments in The IoS."
The plans resulted from one of Britain's least known industrial scandals: the failure of a controversial £473m plant at Sellafield which was, designed to make new fuel out of plutonium and uranium recovered from reprocessing at the nuclear complex.
In March, Energy minister Malcolm Wicks had to admit that the plant, designed to produce 120 tons of the fuel a year, had worked so badly that it had managed only 5.3 in five years of operation. Which meant Sellafield had to turn to its chief rival, in France, to complete its orders.