Dodaj nową odpowiedź

Została opulikowana broszura Macieja Giertycha "Wojna cywilizacji w Europie". Na razie tylko w jęz. angielskim - żeby koledzy z europarlamentu mogli ją czytać. Broszura jest dostępna w internecie na stronie www.giertych.pl.

Broszura jest okropna. Już ludzie narzekają, że Giertych napisał antysemicką książkę. Pewnie Liga będzie Giertycha bronić i nawet nazywać go "filosemitą".

Broszura Giertycha także zawiera inne neandertalskie pomysły.

Oto parę cytatów:

"When children have problems, who do they go to with them? Do parents have time to listen to them and advise them in time? There is only one solution. For home to be the main educator, the mother must be there. I know that I am risking the wrath of many women who might read this. But
let us not fool ourselves. In the civilisations were a mode of family life is so organised
that mothers are at home all the time, the civilisation is perpetuated. In places, where
the mother is absent most of the day, the children risk being educated in a set of values alien to the parents. A home without a mother is an empty home. Children run away from such homes and seek advice elsewhere.

It is absurd that we now have an economic necessity to have two incomes in a family. This is not a choice, but a necessity. The social system must be reorganised to make it possible to live on a single income and to have a living home with a mother always ready to control children and be available to them.

Immigrant families generally are capable of surviving on a single income and the mothers are at home. As a result, the influence of the schools on the children is minimal. It is counterbalanced by the influence of the home. Banning of headscarves will not solve the problem. Children of various civilisations interact in schools
and influence each other. With the influence of the home declining in the western society and with the teaching programs outside parental control, we face the risk of civilisational changes in the next generation.

Our civilisation has to be actively defended. Even at the risk of poverty, we must insist on having control over our children. We must also insist on having control over educational programs. We must demand that TV programs promote noble causes and
upright role models. We must also demand that behaviour proper for our civilisation be lauded and improper scorned. We must insist that immoral music be banned. We must insist that the behaviour of the society at large be appropriate and that when it is not proper, it be penalized. We must try and influence the education of those who
live amongst us but do not have sufficient support from their families. We must also try and influence those among us who are from other civilisations. We should be educationally on the offensive.

Otherwise, our civilisation will loose."

O Żydach:

"The exploitation of rules, of imprecisely written laws, of gaps in them, of their multitude and inconsistencies, activities on the verge of legality, tax evasion techniques, all formally within the law but unethical, derive from the rabbinical casuistry, from the mentality of deriving ethics from the written law. Yet, such a swindler, acting within the law, has in fact no moral respect for any law."

"By their own will, they prefer to live a separate life, in apartheid from the surrounding communities. They form their own communes (kahals), they govern themselves by their own rules
and they take care to maintain also a spatial separateness. They form the ghettos themselves, as districts in which they live together, comparable to the Chinatowns in the USA. It was only Hitler’s Germany that created the concept of forced separation, of a closed ghetto from which Jews were not allowed to leave."