Militarism in Venezuela: Warning Signs of Dictatorship?

English

by Sam Diener

Hugo Chávez has not turned Venezuela into a totalitarian dungeon. In fact, several chavista initiatives have the potential to be models of egalitarian, large-scale, participatory democracy. Nevertheless, Chávez's avowed fondness for the repressive aspects of dictatorships around the world, increasing militarization, and the threat of centralized control of society, could concentrate power in authoritarian hands.

Chávez Proclaims Affinity for Dictatorships

According to the BBC, in July of 2006, Chávez visited the dictator of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, and said, "We see here a model social state like the one we are beginning to create."
Chávez personally received the Iranian regime's highest award from President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2006, according to Breitbart.com. Chávez said he "admired the Iranian president for ëhis wisdom and strength.'"

In Libya, Chávez described himself as "bathed in honor" after receiving the Muammar Qaddafi Prize for Human Rights. In his acceptance speech, Chávez said, according to the Weekly Standard in August of 2005, "Like Yasser Arafat, I now have only the revolutionary's gun, since the olive branch has fallen."

In a joint address by Chávez and Castro on Cuban radio and television, as reported by the Associated Press in August of 2005, Chávez said, "People have asked me how I can support Fidel if he's a dictator. But Cuba doesn't have a dictatorship - it's a revolutionary democracy."
Chávez met with and praised Robert Mugabe, the dictator of Zimbabwe, and praised Mugabe's corrupt land reforms in October of 2005, according to Ireland On-Line, "saying the African leader had been ëdemonized' and that similar reforms were being enacted in his own country."

Threats to Unions

According to the newspaper, Diario El Universal, Public Services International, a global union federation made up of more than 600 trade unions, sent Chávez a communication on May 14, 2007: "You stated that in the context of revolution ëtrade unions should disappear.' This is a view that raises concern among journalists and media workers in Venezuela, and causes concern among us too."

Militarization

According to the BBC, "Russia plans to deliver 30 Sukhoi Su-30 fighter jets and 30 helicopters to Venezuela. Venezuela also plans to buy 100,000 Russian-made AK-103 assault rifles and wants to set up factories on its soil to produce Kalashnikovs under license." (editor's note for web version: different sources provide different numbers for the quantity of fighters and helicopters purchased, see for example, an article by the Council on Foreign Relations). In November of 2007, the Russian state's military export company, Rosoboronexport, said they expect to "double or triple" their current $4 billion worth of military hardware contracts with Venezuela, according to Defense Industry Daily.
The BBC reported that Chávez announced in February of 2006 that he plans to increase the size of the military reserves from the current 500,000 to two million (one in five Venezuelan adults), and plans to arm every one of them.
War Resisters International reported in 2006 that all students in Venezuelan high schools will now be required to undergo two years of military training. (Editor's note for web version: The Chavista-controlled Supreme Court rejected two challenges to this mandate brought by the Venezuelan human rights organization, PROVEA.)

Indoctrination in Schools

According to the Associated Press, Chávez announced in November 2007 that all schools, public and private, must follow a government-mandated curriculum based on government-imposed textbooks, or be closed and/or nationalized.

Zulay Campos of the Bolivarian State Academic Commission, which will inspect schools to make sure they follow these mandates, said, "...If they attack us because we're indoctrinating, well yes, we're doing it, because those capitalist ideas that our young people have - and that have done so much damage to our people - must be eliminated."

Conclusion

El Libertario, an anarchist journal in Venezuela, summarizes their assessment of the threats to liberty in Venezuela in an editorial published in November of 2007: "…we know that we are not faced with the military government of Myanmar but rather an expression of neo-militarism as an efficient model for maintaining the despotic domination of Venezuelan society, in the service of... the global energy market."

(Editor's note for web version: thanks to A-infos, "a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists" for the translation of the El Libertario editorial. For more on the perspectives of El Libertario, please read a fascinating perspective on the Chávez government's refusal to renew the license of RCTV in the spring of 2007, which critiques both the content of RCTV and the government's drive to control the airwaves, english language version printed by the World War 4 Report.)

http://www.peaceworkmagazine.org/militarism-venezuela-warning-signs-dict...

There's something

There's something interesting about potential: while these initiatives have potential to go in the direction of large-scale participatory democracy, they also have the potential to do in the direction of authoritarian statism pretending to be participatory democracy.

If Chavez is so confused to think that Belarus is a good model, then it's clear that all the slogans about "power to the people" really mean nothing more than "power to the authoritarian workers' state that claims its legitimacy through the people.

Honestly I think that most pro-Chavez sentiments are due to leftist wishful thinking.

This militaristic trend has

This militaristic trend has been going on for years. Why do they only wake up to it now?

Yes, we are for dictatorship in Venezuela

As we go for insurrectional anarchism in Poland. Anarchist reformism and capitalist anarchism are the poison to be fought.

We think Poland will be an anarchist zone in the future, meanwhile Russia and Venezuela will clearly not.

Long live the memory of Bakunin and Stalin! Not together in the same area, but distinguishly separated!

Original stalinism in Russia, anarchism in Italy (and maybe in Poland), that makes the world rhythmically fucking anticapitalistic!

We admire the thoughts of Lenin and Alfredo Maria Bonanno!

http://anarcoleninismo.antitech.net/anarcholen-0.html

FUCK STALIN

One of the editors of CIA asked what to do with this crap. Since it's one of the worst things I've seen in a long time, and is either written by some imbecile or a provocateur or agent, it might as well go up as a warning for people.

If this is a real person and if anybody sees him, just kick him in the ass, please. In any situation where they might get a little power, Stalinists belong in a gulag or dead. The person seems to be in Germany where hopefully he will be clearly seen for the kook he is.

How on earth you can match extreme authoritarianism with anti-authoritarianism is beyond me.

Even the insurrectionists

Even the insurrectionists and primitivists are better than that shit! Probably a police agent. Or maybe Germany has computers in its lunatic asylums.

Fuck the Stalinist police

Fuck the Stalinist police provacateur!

Warning signs? What rock have these people been under? This has been going on for years. The guy's a fan of Putin and Castro for fuck's sake!

Look what opposition in Venezuela really is

Please accept that Venezuela is different from Your country. In Venezuela poverty came not from socialism, how it may have been in Poland, but from mean american capitalism and imperialism. Nobody cared about Venezuelan people. They only took the oil and the money and went out of the country with it. I visited both, Poland and Venezuela. And I can tell you, you will not be able to understand each other. Because your recent histories have nearly nothing in common.

If you're living in a hut, Venezuelan government gives you stones for building your own house. And many more basic goods for free. Chavism means, oil reserves are exploited in favour of the whole society, not only for some few rich people how it was before.

Here You see the propaganda of PDVSA
http://www.pdvsa.com

That is a site of a typical government-friendly people's self-organization
http://culturasantarosa.blogspot.com

And here a typical anti-socialist blog
http://resistenciacatiacaracas.blogspot.com/2007_09_01_archive.html

Yeah. Feudal lord also often

Yeah. Feudal lord also often gave peasants "stones for building house", but he also demanded subordination to his power in exchange, as Chavez is doing now. It was clearly stated in his constitutional amendements propositions. As one of resident of barrio in Caracas said to Al Jazzera reporter: "Chavez wants too much for all of this".

Chavez wants only to be publically loved and applaused...

...and then you can go home and do what you want. A very strange dictatorship which has nothing in common with the Soviet one: The "dictator" is more a warranty for a continued LACK of governance than a real political force in that country. Criminality is that high, you risk at every occasion to be stolen or even sequestrated. Arriving in the first bank (Banco de Venezuela, Grupo Santander) in Maiquetia Airport the bank personnel stole me 40 Dollars, giving me for 50 only the exchange of 10 in Bolivars (national currency). And then in Maracay a merchant of electronics and his helpers stole me my video camera. In Caracas I escaped from a situation where 2 young men tried to get in possess of my mobile phone, showing me a big blank knife. I tell you Venezuela is a dangerous country, but not because of police violence. Police has no control. They concentrate on murderers, sequestrators and cocaine trafficants more than on burgellars and thiefs, and for more civilized delinquency they slightly don't have time to interest them. You can sell on the street whatever you like, including homemade copies of sounds and Hollywood movies. You can drive every car as long as its motor runs. Fuel costs are exactly 100 times lower, you pay 2 Euro Cents for 1 liter. Police and military checkpoints do not stop you even when you are drunk. I escaped from a car driven by an alcoholic only by telling him that I would kill him if he did not let me to leave his car, after we had passed successfully two police checkpoints on the wrong street side without being stopped.

The image of a dictatorship is misleading for what Venezuela is. Chavez is more an Indian Chief than a totalitarian Statesman.

Dodaj nową odpowiedź



Zawartość tego pola nie będzie udostępniana publicznie.


*

  • Adresy www i e-mail są automatycznie konwertowane na łącza.
  • Możesz używać oznaczeń [inline:xx] żeby pokazać pliki lub obrazki razem z tekstem.
  • Dozwolone znaczniki HTML: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <small>
  • Znaki końca linii i akapitu dodawane są automatycznie.